Greek Misconceptions Related to Stories of Abraham, Isaac, Moses as well as the Promised Land

Some classical Greek concepts that are associated with the foundation of what is called Cyrene’s nest in Libya are wrong, but we must know them, accompanied by that biblical narrative of the founding of the country of Israel. Within this article we are going to make a presentation of the understanding of different ideas that Philippe Wajdenbaum has and that are located in his article in the Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, something that illustrates that thesis without problems, that is, the Argonauts of the desert.

The current message has drawn attention to the adherence to various common themes for Phirixus, along with Isaac and the resignation of his stories. But n is sure if that delineation of them is guilty of the blurring of those sides in an interpretation that is strict for that my theme, but the common elements are the following:

  1. a) A magnificent mandate to renounce the son.

– It’s real when we talk about Isaac.

– But a lie in the past of Phrixus, this is because the stepmother of this character pays the messages to inform the God who has requested all that sacrifice.

  1. b) A very pious submission of the father towards the order. It is possible to make a last-minute delivery and into the human target by a ram that was divinely sent.

– In the case of Isaac, it is done from the direct command to the father.

– If we talk about the case of Phrixus, we are facing a very direct order regarding the victim of his own sacrifice.

  1. c) A fixation of the ram in silver such as a tree or a bush.

– Issac: it is done before the sacrifice of the ram itself.

– Phrixus: it is done after that sacrifice.

  1. d) The final sacrifice of the ram.

– It is done as a substitute for Isaac.

– Thanksgiving at Phrixus.

The most important of all this is that each narrative system is very similar to the clients that already exist without taking into account those particular stories. We can reverse and reorder everything to be able to develop several stories.

But that concern must be taken into account when asking whether these systems are similar because of that coincidence, or because a set of others has been obtained.

Another of the details to highlight that meat on the tree or bush is distinctive for the validity of that research and for that collection.

To begin with, it is not considered as marginal, they are to take into account the proportion of American biblical scholars where that influence of conservative religious beliefs, along with the evangelical ones is solid, to think about those Old Testament publications within the Holy Bible, something that makes the creation late, even in the Persian or Hellenistic periods, offering the distances that the Jewish and Greek societies have, that opportunity to borrow directly, it is not possible to deny it outright.

On the other hand, the specific opportunities of the Jewish history of that binding of Isaac are being influenced by the Greek.

Thus, we consider that wrong concept with both stories that are in a fairly similar structural position, within those narratives that are parallel.

The stories of human sacrifices or similar will act as the beginning of the great stories that have to do with:

1- The divine promises of the earth that the descendants of the hero will inherit.

2- The special people who are chosen by God.

3- The routine of time that has been pre-established through a total of 4 generations before that land without any doubt to be inherited.

4- The release is carried out through a leader who protests in principle by the fact of stuttering.

5- The additional delay that occurs due to human failure and that allows us to assert ourselves to the divine guarantee.

6- The wandering through the desert of a person with a spiritual ship.

7- The help that is made with the discoveries that are magnificent along the way.

But not only are those stories of escapades from the beginning of those human sacrifices until the stories become more and more comparable, but they can act as a reference factor in both. We can spend more time with these stories together with that servitude as a good factor of origin of those divine guarantees that are guided thanks to the stories of travel to paradise, with an origin factor about the mode of pointer throughout those stories.

Thus, the biblical narrative is more than the very method that the young people that Abraham is going to inherit to the land of Canaan do, in this way Philippe Wajdenbaum, together with his doctoral thesis in 2008 on the Argonauts of the desert, with analysis architectural design of that Hebrew Holy Bible, this will draw the attention of all kinds of experts to the similarities between the works of a philosopher like Plato and the stories that we see in the Holy Bible. All of them are going to contain some basic floods, being the beginning of the third era of the world, as that patriarchal era that meets, with the emergence of those cities, along with the realization, and that growth of regulations and the summary of the optimal state.

The laws within the Pentateuch are very similar to all those regulations recommended by Plato, they are the following:

– The laws that are necessary for a central spiritual authority.

– The demand for pure lineages, especially if we talk about clerics.

– The regulations are dedicated to condemning homosexuality, witchcraft, or magic.

– The laws that have to do with inheritance, or the lipoatrophy of the rocks.

– The regulations that allow us slaves to be all within foreign individuals in a fairway.

_ The regularizations against the need for a king personally.

– The laws that control this spontaneous homicide.

– The laws that are not related to rebellious children.

– The laws against usury, this goes against taking too much fruit from those fields.

There are many more, but they are often located within the same Greek order and with messages in Hebrew.

An ideal state is going to be divided into a total of 12 lots of land and which are given to 12 people.

The king is going to warn about the possibility of being subject to the vices of that love, this is going to lead to what is called domination. This is assumed with the transgressions of David and Solomon.

What prompts Wajdenbaum to use the architectural assessment of misconceptions developed by Claude LéviStrauss for the Bible, you can see from his coverage that it is much more comprehensive than it can be with the cover of a couple of articles. Now, I focus on everything to do with the architectural placement that both Isaac and Phrixus have, something that he sacrifices in their corresponding much larger narratives.

This episode of Phrixus serves as an instruction related to the travels of Jason and those Argonauts, as well as the travel collection will work as a good explanation of that beginning in the Greek swarm of Cyrene in the area of ​​Libya, North Africa.

The Argonaut is awesome and the Story of the Bible.

This legendary and complete Argonaut will be found within the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindatus. This occurs before it has been referenced in Homer’s Bone, Hesiod’s Theogony, and Herodotus, with the structure of Cyrene, including the sacrifice that has been interrupted at Phrixos. Euripides is going to compose a total of 2 works related to the title of Phrixos, now it is lost for us. Together with all this, Apollonia of Rhodes creates the epic proem in reply to Homer. This Argonaútuca has the most important resources of the epic and is associated with the principle of Cyrene. On the other hand, there is the ode of Pindatus is a partner of the king of Cyrene. This can be compared to the biblical narrative that is early from Abraham to Moses and is relative to the Canaanite part.

Jason will be the leader of the Argonautes, something that comes from those relationships that Phrixus has, they are all descendants of Aeolus.

Zeus is very angry with the offspring that Aeolus has due to that attempted sacrifice of Phrexus by his father, and to quell that divine rage of Jason, he is going to indicate in the Argo with that band of followers that are the Argonauts to the recovery of is evellón of gold. It was the fleece of the ram that would save Phrixus at the last moment by being engaged.

Triton, the son of the sea god, called Poseidon, appears humanly and provides one of the most important Argonauts as a guarantee that the descendants will return and the conquest of the land itself. If Eufemo had had a modicum of success in maintaining that land by planting the location of his house, he would not have returned to colonize a total of 4 generations later. The soil has been cleaned locally and the particles arrive from the island of Thera, so it will take 17 generations in total, together with Cyrene, to be colonized by those descendants of the Argonauts, after the establishment within Thera.

In later generations, after those descendants had decided to settle in Thera, the direct descendant of Euphemo will be assigned through an oracle, the Oracle of Delphi. This oracle helps that the people have to guide the people to establish themselves as a people, just as Cyrena fulfills that guarantee that she had made at that time, in which those Argonauts have recovered that fleece of the ram that was saved by Phritux.

This descendant will be referred to as Battus, a name that will suggest us as a stutterer. She is going to argue against the Grand Commando because she was not a good warrior, so she had a good speech. However, the oracle of Delphi is going to come close to paying attention to that factor that does everything that has been said in that way.

Herodotus points out that Battus governs Cyrene for about 40 years.

The promise that Abraham has made about the descendants who settled in Canaan after a total of 400 years of slavery in the Egyptian country should be reported. Here it is an exciting detour in the method for fate as Thera being that Greek myth.

In this way, God is going to order Moses to take these individuals to Canaan invoking the promise to give everything to the parents, that is, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. At first, Moses is going to decline all of this. So if Battus is going to rule the Argonauts for those 40 years, Moses is going to rule his individuals for a total of 40 years.